Fortunately, new treatments for breast cancer are being developed, and breast cancer research is ongoing to fight against this disease. Women in the US have long been encouraged to conduct self-exams for breast cancer and to promptly consult with their doctor if they find any abnormalities. Many times, quick action by women may help lead to early detection of breast cancer, which may ultimately lead to their life being saved. In some instances, however, despite seeking prompt medical attention, the doctor or other health care provider may fail to diagnose the breast cancer, or may fail to prescribe testing to determine the presence of breast cancer. Later, when the woman is determined to have cancer, critical treatment time may have been irreparably lost. As a result, the prognosis for the woman maybe much less favorable.
Failure to Diagnose Breast Cancer Attorneys in Atlanta
Failure to Diagnose Breast Cancer | New York Breast Cancer Diagnosis Failure Attorney GGCRBHS&M
Early detection of breast cancer is crucial — it can mean the difference between life and death. Sadly, our breast cancer lawyers have had to confront the unfortunate fact that many women end up suffering and even losing their lives due to breast cancer misdiagnosis. The failure to diagnose cancer is usually because a test was not done or a doctor or other medical professional misread the test results or missed the signs that should have lead to an accurate diagnosis. A typical example of this in breast cancer malpractice cases occurs when the radiologist misreads a mammogram. Breast cancer is curable. There are approximately 3 million living breast cancer survivors that can attest to this. But the consequences of breast cancer misdiagnosis can be serious and often fatal because early detection is often a breast cancer patient's best hope of defeating the disease.
Failure to Diagnose Breast Cancer
Plaintiff, a 50 year old school teacher, went for a screening mammogram at defendant medical group in The study was interpreted by the defendant radiologist and a report was generated which indicated that it was a benign study. One year later, plaintiff underwent another screening mammogram, which was interpreted by the same radiologist as in The report of this mammogram indicated that there was a suspicious density which required follow up with further studies. Additionally, the radiologist dictated an addendum to this report that stated that the report of the mammogram study was not reflective of his dictation, i.
We alleged that initial scans revealed a mass that should have been subjected to biopsy and that the delay in diagnosis significantly affected the patient's prognosis and chances of recurrence. This case was settled approximately 1 year after the filing of the lawsuit. Contact us today for a free and comprehensive case evaluation. We require no legal retainer or upfront fees, and you pay nothing unless we prevail. Susan G.